Capture the student work
Students upload photos, scans, PDFs, or tablet exports from the assignment page.
Handwritten math grading
Gradenza grades handwritten math from photos, scans, PDFs, and tablet exports without forcing students into typed-answer boxes. The AI reads the working, applies the markscheme, flags uncertain decisions, and gives teachers a reviewable report before feedback is released.

Audience
This workflow fits math classes where handwritten reasoning is the evidence teachers care about.
Teachers grading notebook homework, topic tests, and worked solutions.
IB Math tutors who need method-mark feedback between sessions.
Schools that want AI grading without replacing handwritten assessment.
Students using paper notebooks, stylus apps, scanned PDFs, or Google Drive files.
Workflow
The pipeline treats handwriting capture, OCR, grading, and review as one connected workflow.
Students upload photos, scans, PDFs, or tablet exports from the assignment page.
The system extracts lines of mathematical reasoning and keeps pages attached to the correct question and student.
Gradenza grades against the assignment context, including method marks, accuracy marks, and dependencies where available.
Teachers inspect the report, adjust marks where needed, then release feedback and mastery updates.
Use cases
Use handwritten AI grading when student process matters more than a single answer field.
A student expands, rearranges, and solves across several lines; the report can identify where the method first went wrong.
Students can submit a page containing a diagram, labels, and calculations, with teacher review for ambiguous visual evidence.
The grader can evaluate derivative or integral setup, method marks, and final accuracy separately.
Benefits
Math assessment needs the route to the answer, not just the answer itself.
They do not need equation editors or rigid form fields for every step of a solution.
The AI report is inspectable, and final release remains a teacher action.
Reviewed results can update mastery maps and topic reports instead of disappearing into a pile of images.
Proof and trust
Handwriting quality varies, so the workflow includes checks and human review.
Poor photos can be flagged instead of silently turning unreadable work into unreliable marks.
Teachers can compare the report against the original page before releasing feedback.
The grading model is designed for method, accuracy, reasoning, and dependency decisions.
Related resources
Continue into the adjacent workflow instead of treating this page as a dead end.
FAQ
It can grade many handwritten submissions, but poor image quality or ambiguous working should be reviewed by the teacher. Gradenza is designed to flag uncertain cases.
No. Students can upload phone photos, scans, PDFs, stylus exports, or Google Drive files.
Yes. Once results are reviewed and finalised, they can update topic and subtopic mastery data.
Next step
Start with one handwritten assignment and review the report against the original student pages.